Final Report
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Evaluating Rain Water System Sustainability
3.0 Purpose and Goals of Rain Water Study
4.0 Parameters of the Rain Water System
5.0 How the Rainwater System Works - Weigle's Model
6.0 Benefits of the Rain Water System In ESE Building
7.0 Costs of Implementing Rain Water System for ESE Building
8.0 Limitations
9.0 Recommendations
10.0 Conclusion
References
Bibliography
Appendices
1.0 Introduction
It is impossible to turn back the clocks and live the way our ancestors
did thousands of years ago, but changes in our current lifestyles and the
way in which we view the natural world can help us to achieve a more sustainable
environment. Sustainable development can be both a conceptual framework
and a goal for maintaining and achieving sustainability. The Bruntland
Commissionhas provided the necessary objective for sustainable development,
"to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their needs," but this is only the goal
of sustainable development, it is not a solution nor is it a framework
from which to build a sustainable environment.
Fresh water is one of our most important natural resources as it is
necessary for survival and lacks a substitute. We depend on water for survival
as well as for our convenience; we drink it, cook with it, wash with it,
travel on it,and an enormous amount is used for the purposes of agriculture,
manufacturing, mining, energy production, and waste disposal (Environment
264). Therefore, with respect to sustainability, maintaining the quality
and quantity of water is a top priority.
Water covers approximately three-fourths of the earth's surface, creating
many problems for water management and the implementation of water conservation
technologies (Environment 264). However, from a community level
many water saving tactics can be implemented to conserve this most precious
natural resource.
In light of the new building, the future Centre for Environmental Science
and Engineering (ESE building), scheduled to open in 1998, has provided
an opportunity for a WATgreen
team to initiate the study of a rain water system for the building. The
results of this study could lead to the incorporation of a rain water system
into the plumbing of the ESE building.
The proposed rain water system would involve using rainfall that would
otherwise be collected as surface runoff and channeled through the Region
of Waterloo's storm water sewer system eventually leading to the Grand
River and other small tributaries. With a rain water system, 'free' rainwater
would instead be stored in a rain water storage or retention tank and then
used for flushing toilets, which does not necessitate the use of clean
chemically treated water. The use of a rain water system on the University
of Waterloo campus not only promotes water conservation, but it also promotes
an aspect of sustainable development of such an irreplaceable resource.
In turn, it is the task of the WATGreen team to examine the feasibility
of a rain water system for the ESE building. Considering a significant
component of sustainability is related to economic concerns, both a bio-technical
and a socio-economic study will be performed Prior to the performance of
any such studies however, it is necessary to first identify the components
of the rain water system itself. The WATGreen team has made it their goal
to identify components of the rain water system that are only the most
"environmentally" efficient. That is, each of the components identified
will use as little energy, water as is possible, while minimizing costs
and waste generation.
The physical components of the new building's rain water system will
consist of: the retention tank used for rainwater storage, the plumbing
system which will channel the water to the toilets and channel contaminated
water to sanitary sewers, a connection to the sanitary sewer system to
remove the waste or sewage from the system, a storm sewer connection in
case of overflow in the retention tank due to excessive precipitation,
and 6 litre toilets or the smallest possible flush toilet available on
the market to reduce the amount of water expended by flush toilets.
The inputs into the system will depend on the climate and seasonal conditions
in the Waterloo area. Rainfall will be the prime input into the system,
however some energy will be required to operate the pump, which will pump
the water from the retention tank to the toilets.
SEE SYSTEMS DIAGRAM
After all of this has been completed, what will it all mean to the University
of Waterloo? Simply, the inclusion of a rain water system in new developments
on campus will promote development which is sustainable, and if the system
is incorporated into the design of the building, the University of Waterloo
may be regarded as an environmental pillar of the community. In other words,
UW would be setting the standards for future developments, not only on
campus, but for the Kitchener-Waterloo community and beyond.
Back to Table of Contents
2.0 Evaluating Rain Water System Sustainability
In order to study this system, it becomes necessary for the WATGreen team
to determine what approach or perspective will guide them through the system
study. It is necessary to adopt a specific approach so as to focus the
study and avoid being sidetracked. Similarly, in adopting an approach early
on in the study, direction is established within the study and wasted time
on unnecessary information is avoided.
A rain water system is a means of water conservation and involves the
implementation of a unique plumbing system thus, the study will be completed
from a conservationist/technical perspective. The conservationist's perspective
works toward achieving the optimal use out of existing resources, while
attempting to minimize the use of additional inputs into the system. The
technical aspect of the perspective aims at designing a technically feasible
plumbing system that incorporates the conservationist framework outlined
above. These approaches set the framework from which sustainability will
be evaluated because in order for the development of the new building and
the plumbing system in particular to occur, integration of a natural resource
(water), and integration of human technologies will have to be implemented
in a sustainable manner.
The sustainability framework will be based on both a financial study
and an ecological savings study. The financial study will determine the
predicted monetary savings to the University of Waterloo for treated water
consumption versus the implementation of a rain water system. The ecological
savings study will be determined by the rain water system infrastructure
and the amount of rain water used instead of chemically treated water.
Also, the amount of contaminated water channeled to the Region of Waterloo's
sewage treatment plant will also be assessed.
As analysts of the possibility for a rain water system within the new
building, it becomes necessary for the WATGreen team to know to whom the
issue is of concern and who has some stake in the development of such a
system. Actor systems are comprised of both the main persons or stakeholders
in an issue and the social rules and power structure in which they operate.
These are the people who are affected directly or indirectly by a problem
and who may have a vested interest in its outcome. Actor systems can include
core actors who are at the centre of an issue, supporting actors who are
less involved but can exert influence over an issue, and should-be actors
who may be affected by a problem or its solutions but are unable to participate
in problem resolution or who are unaware of the issue (University of Waterloo).
Within the realm of this system study, it is vital to consider the roles
of the members of the community that will be affected in any decisions
or developments. The inclusion of these actors will allow the development
of the new building to be accepted by the community. For example, we feel
the listed actors below will, or should be involved in the development
of the plumbing system of the ESE building. Their stake in the matter is
described in detail following their listing below:
-
Core Actors:
-
Researchers (ERS285 Students)
-
Plant Operations Staff (UW)
-
New Building Committee (UW)
-
Architects and Contractors (UW)
-
Supporting Actors
-
Weigle Reality
-
Staff and Faculty
-
Regional Municipality of Waterloo
-
Should-be Actors
-
Private Financial Donors
-
Provincial Government
-
Students (UW)
-
WPIRG
Click here for more info on these groups
The roles of these actors is critical to the study of the system. For
example, the role of the students is to assess the feasibility of a rain
water system in the ESE building. The plant operations staff are responsible
for the technical aspects and the maintenance of the system, and the New
Building Committee will be responsible for the implementation of a rain
water system into the cost and design of the building, as are the architects
and contractors.
The supporting actors should influence the core actors to implement
a rain water system. Weigle Reality should encourage the University of
Waterloo to implement a rain water system into the ESE building because
of the success they have in their condominium complex, which has a rain
water system incorporated into its design. The Region of Waterloo should
encourage the core actors to incorporate any environmental technologies
into new developments to sustain the Waterloo community.
The should-be actors are mainly the financial sponsors of the new ESE
building. For example, private donors and the provincial government who
are mainly providing the funds for the building should have a say in the
design of the building and it's environmental standard. The students and
WPIRG should be concerned about what the University of Waterloo is constructing
on campus and in light of the attention the natural environment is receiving
in the 1990s the students and WPIRG should make sure that the UW only promotes
the most environmental technologies available.
Back to Table of Contents
2.1 Criteria to Evaluate the Feasibility & Benefits of a Rain Water
System
The first criteria used to evaluate the system will be the precipitation
levels which occurred in previous years, and recorded at the University
of Waterloo. The second criteria will be the flushing demands of toilets
in the environmental science and engineering buildings. The last four criteria
will be used to formulate a Cost-Benefit Analysis. Theses four criteria
will be:
-
energy requirements to operate the pump
-
the costs of water necessitated by present flushing demands
-
the costs for the over all implementation of the rain water system
-
the cost for maintaining a rain water system over the long-term
In order to evaluate the feasibility of the system, the precipitation will
be measured and the flushing demands will be monitored. The precipitation
data will be obtained from the Larry Lamb ecology lab located on the University
of Waterloo campus. This precipitation data is an extremely important aspect
of the system as it will indicate whether or not enough rainfall is present
in one year to meet the flushing demand. Similarly, it will indicate how
much treated water will be needed to compensate for the difference in rain
water and flushing demand if it is found that not enough rain falls in
one year to meet the flushing needs of the new building. The flushing demands
at the University of Waterloo will be measured via counting the average
number of flushes in an 8hr. day. The information required to complete
a CBA will be obtained from the University of Waterloo's Plant Operations
department, from Paul Weigle a contractor and supporter of rain water systems,
and from the new building committee.
Back to Table of Contents
3.0 Purpose and Goals of Rain Water Study
The roles of humans within this issue has been already discussed. It is
ironic that this WATGreen team of 1995 are faced with a task of redesigning
a system which will replace a plumbing system that was designed by humans
and accepted for so many years. Directing rain water to a storm sewer may
have seemed like a solution to the causes of excessive overland flow as
a result of human developments. Because humans have created many impermeable
surfaces into the natural system, humans have also had to create a system
to redirect the surface runoff or overland flow. Therefore, in trying to
rectify the problem environmental engineers have devised a system to remove
rain water from roof tops and other concrete and asphalt surfaces.
However, in trying to remedy the problem of overland flow, rainwater
has needlessly been redirected to rivers and other water bodies. To a certain
degree this water is necessary to replenish the hydrological cycle, but
some of the rainwater can be redirected for use in buildings that would
otherwise require chemically treated water. Therefore, the purpose and
goals of this study is to:
-
Determine the amount of water needed to flush toilets in a building the
size of the ESE building.
-
Determine the amount of rainwater that could be accumulated on an annual
basis.
-
Evaluate possible storage methods for the rainwater (ie. the size of the
retention or storage tanks).
-
Examine a suitable plumbing system with the inclusion of 6 litre toilets
or the lowest possible flush toilets available on the market.
-
Determine the present costs for supplying chemically treated water for
flushing toilets.
-
Determine initial costs of implementing a rain water system in the new
buil$
Back to Table of Contents
4.0 Parameters of the Rain Water System
While studying the inputs and outputs of the system, it is extremely necessary
to focus on the system's boundaries so as to avoid the unnecessary inclusion
of irrelevant or inapplicable data. The dimensions of the new ESE building
will be approximately 148 000 square feet, which will be approximately
the size of the present psychology building located on the Waterloo campus.
The size of this new building is relevant in determining the potential
amounts of rainwater that could be accumulated from the collection surfaces.
The larger the building, the more collection surfaces that could be located.
The environment of the system is enclosed within the structure of the building,
allowing inputs from the physical environment. The environment includes
the collection of rainwater from the roof of the building and all balconies
or patios, and the plumbing which will include the most efficient toilets
suitable for non-residential use, and the retention tank or cistern. The
size of the cistern which will supply the water needed by the flushing
of toilets, will be a function of the flushing demand of the new building
as well as the amount of rainfall per year.
The system is dependent on the initial inputs into the system (rainwater).
However, in order to have a reliable system it is necessary to have a backup
source in order to provide for maximum efficiency in the event that sufficient
amounts of rainwater to meet the flushing demands does not fall. Therefore,
a connection to treated water supplied from the Region of Waterloo, which
will also provide water for any other plumbing component in the building
such as sinks, will fuel the system when needed. The main feature of this
system is to reduce the stress on water use on the University of Waterloo
campus and the system will benefit the environment by producing less stress
on the sanitary sewer system and eliminating waste more efficiently.
Back to Table of Contents
5.0 How the Rain Water System Works - Weigle's Model
The workings of the rain water system to flush toilets is really much simpler
than it may appear. Rain water/snow melt is first of all collected from
every available rooftop, patio or balcony. Patio stones cover these surfaces
entirely and are spaced approximately 2.5 cm above underlying pads. Separating
the patio stones from the pads is a layer of gravel which facilitates the
infiltration of the water. Drains are located at the corners of the rooftop/patio/balcony
feeding down into a main artery which channels rain water into the awaiting
concrete cistern.
The main artery feeds the concrete cistern from a hole located towards
the top of the tank. The cistern is lined with rubber to prevent the adverse
corrosion effects of the acid rain. A float valve is located within the
cistern to detect low rain water levels. In the event that insufficient
amounts of rain water are being fed into the cistern, a backup system which
pumps city water into the tank exists. The city water is fed in through
a separate pipe by way of a shower head to avoid a bacteria transfer between
the rain water and already treated city water.
Within the cistern there is an aeration system to oxygenate the water
to prevent stagnent odours. This system is triggered daily by and automatic
timing device. There is also a disturbulation system to circulate any sediment
that may collect on the bottom of tank. According to Paul Weigle, in three
years of use, this system has never needed to be used. It has been placed
there for long-term maintenance of the entire rain water system. Pumps
and pressure tanks serve to pump the water from the cistern to toilets
and lawn sprinklers. To achieve maximum efficiency, the pumps are located
beneath the water level in the cistern. Therefore the pumps only have to
function for approximately 30 minutes each day.
The system proposed for the ESE building is similar to Paul Weigle's
system, differing only in it's use and perhaps size. While Weigle's system
is used for flushing toilets, lawn irrigation, and washing vehicles; the
system proposed for the ESE building will limited to flushing toilets.
Back to Table of Contents
6.0 Benefits of the Rain Water System In ESE
6.1 Economic Benefits
There are two main costs incurred when city water is imported to the university
to flush toilets. There is a charge for water consumption which at the
time of the study was .68/cubic metre. Also incurred, is a sewage consumption
charge of .72/cubic metre (City of Waterloo,March 1,95). Using a rain water
system, both of these costs would be eliminated as no water is being imported,
it is assumed that no sewage consumption charge can be totalled (Kay,March
28,95). The university would only be charged for the city water pumped
in to compensate for low rain water levels during dry times of the year.
Back to Table of Contents
6.2 Environmental Benefits
While the economic benefits outline the affordability of a rainwater system
to flush toilets, there are environmental benefits that justify implementing
such a system. First of all, by re-using rainwater, the demand is ruduced
on the regions already scarce water resources (Mitchell Feb. 28, 1995)
Secondly, because of the acidic composition of rainwater, the need to chemically
treat and deoderize toilet water is eliminated. Acid rain fails to stain
toilets and similarly wards of bacteria that previous toilet sanitation
products were needed to eliminate (Weigle March 7 1995). Lastly the use
of low flush toilets will lesssen the demand at the water treatment plants
as there will be less waste water.
Back to Table of Contents
7.0 Costs of Implementing Rain Water System for ESE Building
Complete costs cannot be estimated until the following information has
been obtained:
-
The actual size of the collection area(s)
-
The number of toilets to be installed in the building
-
Flush demand
This is the minimum amount of information that is needed to provide
an accurate cost estimate. Paul Weigle stated that a "ballpark figure"
cannot be obtained until these requirements are met. Contact information
for Paul Weigle can be found on the contact sheet.
Back to Table of Contents
7.1 Maintenance
Two types of maintenance costs are involved with this rain water system:
long term costs and short term costs. Regarding the rain water systems
already in place, no short term costs have been incurred. This time span
involves a three year period, beginning with the commissioning of the system
to flush toilets successfully (Weigle,March 7,95).
Long term costs are presently difficult to predict as no rain water
system fulfilling the purpose of flushing toilets has been in place long
enough to make a valid estimate. There is a possibility, like within any
system for difficulties to occur with its individual parts after working
for extended periods of time. For this system in particular, problems may
arise with the pumps (Weigle,March 7,95).
Back to Table of Contents
8.0 Limitations
Throughout the course of this study, the WATGreen Team was limited by certain
factors.
-
UNAVAILABLE DATA
-
specific costs incurred by the University of Waterloo to flush toilets
in designated areas.
-
costs of individual components of the system
-
the amount of water (cubic meters) used per building was unavailable, therefore
a ratio of general water use to water used for flushing toilets was not
possible which prohibited the use of this information in the Cost-Benefit
Analysis
-
FLUSH DEMAND STUDY
-
Previous flush demands have not been conducted at the University of Waterloo,
therefore they had to be obtained through observation (Appendix B). The
WATGreen Team realizes that this is not the desired method of data collection
and this will be recognized in the recommendations portion of this study
(Section 10.0).
-
Insufficient background literature on rain water systems to flush toilets.
This inhibited the WATGreen team from looking beyond the sources who had
actually implemented such a system to obtain information.
Back to Table of Contents
9.0 Recommendations
Based on the limitations that inhibited a more thorough study of the implementation
of the rain water system for the new building, several recommendations
are suggested by this WATGreen team.
-
A complete flush demand study, sighting the specific water requirements
for flushes within a building the same size as the new ESE building.
-
Based on flush demand results and a more detailed analysis of precipitation
records, an exact calculation of cistern size should be performed.
-
Scoping should be done for contractors and architects other than Paul Weigle
who have the knowledge and expertise to design and construct a rain water
collection system for cost comparisons.
-
A study should be done by the architects of the new building on how to
maximize areas for rain water collection within the new building.
-
It is recommended by the WATGreen team that three years following the implementation
of the rain water system within the new building, a follow-up study be
performed comparing the costs of running this system compared to other
systems of comparable size within the University of Waterloo's boundaries.
Back to Table of Contents
10.0 Conclusion
In today's day and age of increased environmental concern over sustainability,
changing things in such a way so as to reduce one's ecological footprint
is essential. The implementation of a rain water system on campus will
not only reduce the university's ecological footprint, but also set the
stage for futuresustainable developments. Also key, is the fact that the
system would exist within an Environmental Science and Engineering Building
- a suitable setting for a state of the art environmental technology.
Back to Table of Contents
References
-
City of Waterloo - North Hydro, Water Bill, March 1, 1995.
-
Kokko, John. Telephone Interview, March 27, 1995.
-
Mitchell, Bruce. Lecture: Water Resources, February 28,1995.
-
Raven et al.. Environment. Saunders College Publishing: New York, 1993.
-
"The New Building is Coming", In The Gazette. February 15, 1995.
-
Weigle, Paul. Interview and Tour, March 7,1995.
-
Weigle, Paul. Telephone Interview, March 27,1995.
Back to Table of Contents
Bibliography
Back to Table of Contents
Appendices
Appendix A: Rain Water Systems Diagram

Back to Table of Contents
Appendix B: Flush Study Results

Back to Table of Contents